Mr Pistorius may have to undergo psychiatric tests to establish if he has a general anxiety disorder (GAD)
The prosecution in the trial of South African Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius has formally requested that he undergo a mental observation.
Prosecution lawyer Gerrie Nel made the application after forensic psychiatrist Merryll Vorster said the double amputee was "a danger to society".
Judge Thokozile Masipa said she would announce her decision on Wednesday.
Mr Pistorius denies intentionally killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day last year.
He says he accidentally shot her through the toilet door in a state of panic, mistaking the 29-year-old model and law graduate for an intruder.
'Manifestly absurd'
The prosecution accused the defence on Tuesday of changing its plea - from putative self-defence to a psychiatric disorder.
Mr Nel said that a "psychiatric evaluation was essential" and it was in the interests of justice for the accused to be referred.
The defence is vigorously resisting the prosecution move, which it argues is "manifestly absurd".
Dr Vorster told the court earlier that she would not say that Mr Pistorius had "a mental illness" and that he was "still able to function at high level as an athlete and still able to socialise".
But she said that people with Generalised Anxiety Disorders (Gads) like Mr Pistorius probably should not have firearms.
She said that Gad would not "render you unfit to stand trial".
The BBC's Andrew Harding says that the psychiatrist shored up the defence's argument that Mr Pistorius does not need mental evaluation.
On Monday she said that the athlete had had an anxiety disorder since childhood and was "anxious" about violent crime.
His actions on Valentine's Day last year "should be seen in context of his anxiety" and would have been different from "normal, able-bodied person", she said.
The couple had been dating for just a few months when she was shot dead in 2013
If the prosecution request is granted, Mr Pistorius may spend up to 30 days in a state mental health institution for observation and assessment of his mental health.
Court sources have indicated that it is unlikely the judge will grant the prosecution its request, our reporter says.
There are no juries at trials in South Africa, so the athlete's fate will ultimately be decided by the judge, assisted by two assessors.
If found guilty, Mr Pistorius - a national sporting hero dubbed the "blade runner" because of the prosthetic limbs he wears to race - could face life imprisonment.
If he is acquitted of murder, the court must consider an alternative charge of culpable homicide, for which he could receive about 15 years in prison.
----------------------------------------
The prospect of Oscar Pistorius being booked into a medical facility for a month of psychiatric evaluation has lent this long trial a surreal quality.
Both the defence and the prosecution insist they do not believe the athlete is mentally ill, making the prosecution's request for the evaluation - in the "interests of justice" - more than a little confusing.
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel said he had no option but to ask for it, after the defence raised the suggestion that Mr Pistorius' "anxiety disorder" might have affected his behaviour the night he killed Reeva Steenkamp.
One theory is that the prosecution is simply trying to fire a shot across the defence's bows - discouraging them from making too much of the athlete's state of mind - and is anticipating that Judge Masipa will reject their application for medical evaluation. They may also be laying grounds for a future appeal.
The Pistorius family - and their lawyer Barry Roux - are clearly upset by what they see as a crude "ploy" by the prosecutor. But this case may well hinge on the judge's understanding of Mr Pistorius' state of mind when he pulled the trigger, and the prosecution is keen to show that the defence keeps changing its version - from putative self-defence, to accidental shooting, and now to something linked to his "anxiety disorder".
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment